November 9, 2006

Bought And Paid For

Speaker-to-be Nancy Pelosi is poised to make one of the first key decisions that will demonstrate her level of seriousness and responsibility on matters of national security, and it appears that she will allow political considerations to trump security concerns right out of the gate. It has been learned that Pelosi will pass over Rep.Jane Harmon (D-CA), the ranking Democrat on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence for the chairmanship, in favor of Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL).

J. Peter Pham and Michael I. Krauss, writing at TCS, explain the reason for the move:

The move would be a payback to the Congressional Black Caucus, to whose support Pelosi owes her election as Minority Leader and whose members she angered by picking Ms. Harman to be ranking member over Georgia Rep. Sanford Bishop in 2003. The incoming Speaker must also mollify the Black Caucus for having pushed Louisiana Rep. William Jefferson (he of the frozen cash) off the Ways and Means Committee.

A little political horse-trading in Washington is just par for the course, right? It's to be expected no less than popcorn at the movies. Whatever your thoughts about the identity politics epitomized by the Congressional Black Caucus, it is still understandable that they might be thrown a bone by the incoming Speaker as payback for whatever past slights she may be guilty of. But it shouldn't be this rotten bone.

Shouldn't the person we entrust with our most closely guarded national security and intelligence secrets be someone we know to be a person of impeccable integrity and trustworthiness? Someone who, say for example, cannot be bought? That would not be Alcee Hastings. More from the TCS article:

Mr. Hastings's own website says this about his pre-Congressional background: "Known to many as 'Judge,' Congressman Hastings has distinguished himself as an attorney, civil rights activist, judge, and now Member of Congress. Appointed by President Carter in 1979, he became the first African-American Federal Judge in the state of Florida, and served in that position for ten years."

What this autobiography omits are the reasons Hastings' judicial tenure, normally a life appointment, was cut short after only a decade. Barely two years into office, "Judge" Hastings accepted a $150,000 bribe in exchange for giving a lenient sentence to two swindlers, then lied in subsequent sworn testimony about the incident. The case involved two brothers, Frank and Thomas Romano, who had been convicted in 1980 on 21 counts of racketeering. Together with attorney William Borders Jr., Hastings, who presided over the Romanos' case, hatched a plot to solicit a bribe from the brothers. In exchange for a $150,000 cash payment to him, Hastings would return some $845,000 of their $1.2 million in seized assets after they served their three-year jail terms.

Taped conversations between Hastings and Borders confirmed that the judge was a party to the plot. Hastings was also criminally prosecuted for bribery, but his accomplice Borders went to prison rather than testify against him...

...The Democrat-controlled House of Representatives impeached Hastings for bribery and perjury by a lopsided vote of 413 to 3. Then the Democrat-controlled Senate convicted him on eight articles of impeachment by well over the required two-thirds majority in 1989. Thus Mr. Hastings became only the sixth judge in the history of our Republic (and only the third in the 20th Century) to be removed by Congress. He was, and is, an utter disgrace to the nation and to the legal profession. Among those voting to impeach him were Ms. Pelosi herself, Maryland Rep. Steny Hoyer, the Democratic whip who is likely to become the new House majority leader, and Mr. Hastings' fellow African-American Congressman, Michigan's John Conyers, who took pains to deny that race had anything to do with the removal of the bribe-taking jurist...

...Since shamelessly taking his seat in the very House that overwhelmingly impeached him, Congressman Hastings has not appeared chastened by his scandal-plagued past. Reports circulate that the "Judge" is the subject of speculation about a conflict of interest. At issue this time is the fact that Hastings added to his Congressional payroll one Patricia Williams, described as a "close personal friend" and former attorney. Williams represented the then-judge at his bribery trial and impeachment hearings, but was herself disbarred in June 1992 for misuse of clients' funds. Mr. Hastings is said to owe Mr. Williams substantial lawyer's fees for her services in the eighties—over $500,000 according to some estimates—and some see his decision to make her a staff assistant as a form of debt-settling at the public's expense. Ms. Williams' annual salary as "staff assistant" is reported to be an impressive $129,000. Here are two other publicly reported annual salaries from Mr. Hastings' office which are quite telling: Vanessa Griddine, staff assistant (scheduler), $71,000; Fred Turner, chief of staff: $67,200.

Ms. Griddine must be one heck of a scheduler, as she earns nearly four thousand dollars a year more than Mr. Turner, the Congressman's chief of staff. The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) reports that Ms. Griddine, not Mr. Turner, recently accompanied Hastings on a trip to Portugal and Spain—earlier she had traveled with him to Brussels, at a cost to taxpayers of over $14,000. Doubtless her presence is constantly required to help arrange last-minute scheduling.

Rep. Hastings record on matters of national security and intelligence is not encouraging either. There's much more in the TCS piece and a good deal of additional detail in this recent article from FPM.

This job is too important, as the FPM article puts it, "to hand leadership and even more dangerous--access to America’s most sensitive secrets--to a man who has shown that he is a criminal who can be bought" , no matter how many favors Nancy Pelosi owes to the Congressional Black Caucus.

Related:

FPM - A Profile in Corruption - May 2006

UPDATE 11/11: Hastings isn't the only Democrat in line for a key committee post who has a checkered ethical past.

Posted by dan at November 9, 2006 11:44 PM